A recent survey conducted by Muna Suhailah of Petromindo highlights varying perceptions of Chinese mining equipment among Indonesian stakeholders. The study, carried out between October 22 and November 10, 2024, gathered insights from 144 respondents, including professionals from the mining sector and related industries.
Key Findings:
-
Quality Perception: Half of the respondents believe Chinese mining equipment is on par with products from other countries, while 42.4% rate it as inferior. Only 7.6% consider it superior. The mining sector specifically echoed similar sentiments, with 52.8% rating the quality lower than international competitors.
-
Top Brands: Sany, XCMG, and Liugong emerged as the most recognized Chinese brands in Indonesia. Sany leads significantly, with 66.7% identifying it as the most widely used.
-
Positive Impacts: Despite quality concerns, 53.5% of participants acknowledged the positive impact of Chinese equipment, citing its affordability as a critical factor in reducing operational costs.
-
Challenges: Common issues included low durability, faster wear and tear, and unstable performance. Satisfaction levels averaged 3.31 out of 5, indicating "somewhat satisfied" sentiments among users.
-
Future Considerations: While 66% of respondents saw no need to reduce dependence on Chinese equipment, 34%—predominantly from the mining sector—advocated for diversifying import sources. Japan, Europe, and the USA were preferred alternatives.
Recommendations for Improvement:
The report suggests that Chinese manufacturers focus on enhancing product quality by investing in better raw materials, innovative designs, and robust production processes. Addressing these concerns could solidify their position in Indonesia's competitive mining sector.
You can read the complete report below.
For further details, contact survey@petromindo.com.
